it is the midterm of internat bus fin amp banking A+ Writers |

i need 12 pages double space for these questions totally. it is the midterm and it include one case analysis and three short answers.



composition of the leaving gases using a stoichiometric table the standard heat of reaction the heat that needs to be exchanged A+ Writers |

-composition of the leaving gases using a stoichiometric table

-the standard heat of reaction

– the heat that needs to be exchanged



internet and human rights A+ Writers |

The assignment is to answer the question: What impact has the Internet had on Human Rights? No more than 400 words.



week 2 forum 5 A+ Writers |

Just as organizations develop strategy, individuals do too. When considering strategy and creating intended strategy, think about whyyou are doing what you do. The YouTube video at the link below is interesting in understanding how to answer the question of “why?”

Discuss Intended Strategy and Realized Strategy as it relates to your life



executing the project answer the two questions A+ Writers |

Case Study 1.1 MegaTech, Inc.

MegaTech, Inc. is designed to highlight some of the reasons why an organization that had operated in a relatively stable and predictable environment would seek to move to an emphasis on project-based work. The trigger event, in this case is the advent of the NAFTA treaty, which opened up competition on a more price-competitive basis.


  1. What is it about project management that offers MegaTech a competitive advantage in its industry?
  2. What elements of the marketplace in which MegaTech operates led the firm to believe that project management would improve its operations

500 words



reply to another students discussion board 2 A+ Writers |

Please draft a response to another students discussion board. Here is the original instructions for this students post:

  1. Which of the four philosophical worldviews/frameworks listed above most closely aligns with your perspective and the way that you view problems in the world? How does your research worldview/framework compare with worldview/frameworks that align with qualitative methodology?
  2. How does understanding the connection between philosophical worldviews/frameworks and qualitative research methodology assist in your approach to conducting research? What do you need to consider?
  3. Compare/contrast philosophical worldview with that of a Christian worldview. Are there any areas that are problematic or do most philosophical worldviews/frameworks appear to be congruent with a Christian worldview?
  4. How does Keller’s perspective on being frustrated in your work (p. 94) relate to frustration in conducting research?

Here is the students original post that you are replying to:

Jesus tells us in John 12:26, “If anyone serves me, he must follow me.” Christians are bound to follow the example of Jesus Christ in their daily lives, and their covenant with God firmly establishes a Christian worldview that calls us to serve the Lord and serve others before ourselves. A belief in God, faith in God, trust in God, a joy in the heart, a compassion for others, and a desire to do good and glorify God are characteristics of a Christian worldview. Keller and Alsdorf (2012) discussed how a Christian worldview may be applied to a work philosophy and reminded Christians that work should “fit our gifts and capacities” (p. 103) and benefit others, while we should “show a better, fairer, more skillful, more ennobling way of doing what you do” (p. 104).

This Christian worldview and work philosophy should then inform a Christian scholar’s academic assumptions and philosophical approaches to research. Led by their worldview and equipped with a desire to examine social phenomena, social researchers look around them and ask why people act, think, perceive, and communicate in the ways that they do and what impact their behavior has on others around them. Every researcher brings with them unique experiences and history that affect their worldview, their philosophy, and their orientation to research (Creswell & Ploth, 2018). How individuals perceive the world impacts how they approach research (Overview and introduction to qualitative research methods, 2020). Creswell and Ploth (2018) explained an approach to research is founded on a researcher’s philosophical worldview based upon ontological, epistemological, axiological, and methodological views. These philosophical considerations address how one views reality, knowledge, value, and procedures. Creswell and Ploth (2018) discussed how these philosophical assumptions lead to four main interpretive frameworks that include postpositivism, social constructivism, transformative framework, and postmodernism. Guided by these paradigms, scholars shape their research questions, design their studies, determine their methods, and interpret their results.

As a communication scholar, I am primarily interested in exploring and examining the complicated nature of communication. I believe that meaning is multiple and varied, and that knowledge is socially constructed. Since I situate multiple meanings within social interactions, I value the reflexivity of the researcher, and I prefer to explore the social world through interacting with participants and interpreting their experiences. These beliefs lead me to study communication through a constructivist’s lens. Lindlof (2008) defined constructivism as a social science paradigm that assumes individuals actively participate in creating meaning of their world. Constructivists adhere to the tenet that “reality is actively constructed – that is, created, maintained, and transformed – by human actors” (Lindlof, 2008, p. 944). Constructivism aligns with the goals of communication research because communication as a discipline is about studying how people negotiate, create, and share meaning (Gasiorek & Hubbard, 2017).

As a Christian, communication scholar with a constructivist’s perspective, qualitative research presents an appropriate way to investigate communication phenomena. Creswell and Ploth (2018) describe qualitative research as beginning with the “assumptions and the use of interpretive/theoretical frameworks that inform the study of research problems addressing the meaning individuals or groups ascribe to a social or human problem” (p. 8). Qualitative research is directed by the belief that reality is subjective, and that truth is constructed individually. Qualitative researchers work inductively, beginning with research questions about social phenomenon that ask why, what, or how (Overview and introduction to qualitative research methods, 2020), and then they collect data in naturalistic settings, asking individuals or observing people to see how they experience the world (Creswell & Cresswell, 2018). Words are the units of analysis for qualitative studies. Researchers collect data in the form of interviews or observation, and then they code the data, looking for emerging themes. The process is interactive, engaging, and emerging (Creswell & Creswell, 2018; Creswell & Ploth, 2018). Terrell (2016) explained qualitative research is approached from an insider’s perspective “by direct involvement, collaboration, and interaction with the research participants” (p. 147). Therefore, authenticity is the hallmark of solid qualitative research (Creswell & Ploth, 2018). Constructivist and transformative research studies are most closely tied to qualitative research studies. At the conclusion of a qualitative research study, researchers often form theories to explain their findings. This is one reason that qualitative research frequently precedes quantitative research (Overview and introduction to qualitative research methods, 2020) because those theories can then be tested through quantitative methods.

According to Creswell and Ploth (2018), researchers should seek methodological congruence in their work. This means that “the purposes, questions, and methods of research are all interconnected and interrelated so that the study appears as a cohesive whole rather than as fragmented, isolated parts” (p. 50). Aligning the researcher’s background, worldview, philosophical assumptions, interpretive framework, and approach to research creates studies that are harmonious, connected, and ultimately, stronger. For this reason, it is essential for researchers to consider their history, standpoint, and philosophy, so they may select an appropriate and relevant approach to research. With a firm understanding of the foundations to research, researchers may then design rigorous, robust research studies that appropriately address social phenomena. With congruence between their research and their Christian worldview, Christian scholars may avoid the trap of seeing research as frustrating, meaningless work. Instead, according to Keller and Alsdorf (2012), we are called to be fairer, more skilled, and more ennobled scholars. Proverbs 3:5-6 reminds us how we can answer that call, “Trust in the Lord with all your heart, and do not lean on your own understanding. In all your ways acknowledge him, and he will make straight your paths.”


Creswell, J.W., and Creswell, J.D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed

methods approaches (5th ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Creswell, J. W. & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among

five approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Gasiorek, J., & Ebesu Hubbard, A. S. (2017). Perspectives on perspective-taking in

communication research. Review of Communication, 17(2), 87–105.

Keller, T & Alsdorf, K. (2012). Every good endeavor: Connecting your work to God’s work.

New York, NY: Penguin Random House LLC.

Lindlof, T. (2008). Constructivism. In W. Donsbach (Ed.), The International Encyclopedia of

Communication (pp. 944-950). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Overview and introduction to qualitative research methods . (2020). Blackboard.

Instructions on replying include:

For your replies, respond to at least 2 classmates building upon the original thread or offering a contrasting viewpoint.



two part assignment part 1 a full page and part 2 a minimum of 2 full pages A+ Writers |

This is a two-part assignment. Part 1-a full page and Part 2 – a minimum of 2 full pages

In the first part students will read from the list (list on page two) and write down the first thing that comes to their mind. Not what you think you should say, what you think I want to hear or what you think is a right answer. You can’t be wrong. The point is for you to be honest with your first thought. On your first page of this assignment number 1-30 and type my list. Then, next to it type your first thought for example:

  1. female drivers : (are)- distracted or fast or whatever first comes to mind
  2. the elderly: (are) slow, or kind, or whatever first comes to mind

Part two: Attach to page 1(page break then continue on next page). *****This needs to be all on one document*****

Stereotypes are prevalent on TV. Write an additional 2-page paper discussing stereotypes you’ve seen on television.

  • Identify the shows you watched and use specific examples.
  • Also, include examples of how you have been influenced by stereotypes you’ve seen on television (currently or in the past). Do not tell me you have never been influenced!
  • You should discuss at least three TV shows in your paper.
  • I am really looking for details not generalities.

Papers Must:

  • Be typed in Word
  • Use New Times Roman 12 point font
  • Be double spaced
  • Include proper spelling, grammar and sentence structure
  • Include proper essay/paper format (introduction, body, conclusion)

Stereotype List

  1. Cheerleader
  2. Professional athlete
  3. Lawyer
  4. Computer technician
  5. Police Officer
  6. Single Parent
  7. Asian
  8. Italian
  9. Hispanic
  10. White
  11. Black
  12. Native American
  13. Middle Eastern
  14. Blonde
  15. Brunette
  16. Christian
  17. Catholic
  18. Jewish
  19. Muslim
  20. Mormon
  21. Atheist
  22. Elderly
  23. Homeless
  24. Teacher
  25. Student
  26. Democrat
  27. Republican
  28. Vegetarian
  29. Housewife
  30. Teenager



childhood math and science 1 A+ Writers |

1 inch all sides, APA format, New Times Roman 12, 4 pages all double spaced and all headings must be in bold, all sources must be sited



e learning 3 A+ Writers |

This is a discussion post, 3-4 sentences will suffice. The response needs to be comprehensive. Please list references which must include the course reference listed at the bottom.

Respond from the standpoint that your organization uses e-Learning.

1.Does your organization use e-Learning?

2.What training methods does your organization use? (see PowerPoint)

3.Are your organization’s training methods effective? (see PowerPoint)

4.What are the advantages and disadvantages of your organization’s training and development methods? (see PowerPoint, slide 24).

5.What online training and development systems/methods would you recommend? Explain.

Kavanagh, M. J., Thite, M., & Johnson, R. D. (2018). Human resource information systems: Basics, applications, and future directions (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.



engh120 discussion writev A+ Writers |

The discussion is short consisting of 500 words and I have essays and questions about them.Even the reference represents, they are short and easy.